top of page

#PullUpOrShutUp

Hi there - for those of you who don’t know us, we are Ramin, Ceri and Abbii. We welcome Theatre Action’s (@TheatreCTA) call for greater transparency regarding Black representation in the theatre industry. DEM Productions has been working across Fringe, Off-West End and West End theatre for the last 6 years (2014-2020).

 

We have compiled data on 426 individuals we have worked with in the following capacities: Creatives, Performers, Musicians, Crew/Production, Marketing & PR, and Producers. This is on projects ranging from rehearsed readings, workshops, and full productions from pub theatre plays to West End musicals (a total of 24). We have compiled data on racial identity, gender identity, sexuality and disability.

 

DEM Productions comprises 3 permanent company staff, of which 2 are female-identifying and 1 is male-identifying. 2 are White and 1 is of mixed heritage.

 

Of the 426 individuals we have worked with in the capacities listed above since 2014:

 

52.6% (224) were Male-Identifying, of which 0.9% (2) identified as Trans-gender Male

46.9% (200) were Female-Identifying, of which 0% (0) identified as Trans-gender Female

0.5% (2) identified as Non-Binary/Gender Fluid

 

79.8% (340) were White-European

8.0% (34) were of other White backgrounds (including Jewish)

5.4% (23) were Black

1.9% (8) were South Asian

2.6% (11) were East Asian

2.3% (10) were Mixed Race

 

0.7% (3) identified as having a physical disability

 

11.7% (50) identified as a Gay Man

1.9% (8) identified as a Lesbian/Gay Woman

1.2% (5) identified as Bisexual

0.1% (4) identified elsewhere on the LGBTQIA+ spectrum

As a small core team, we are incredibly fortunate to have worked closely with all of these individuals. The data we have compiled is based on our very best knowledge of the individuals we have worked with, however we feel it is important that we note it is likely that there are gaps in our knowledge, and that therefore the data cannot be 100% accurate. 

 

We apologise that we have not consistently and accurately monitored the representation present within our workforce, and we must do better. Going forwards, we will be finding ways to more accurately and sensitively monitor the representation in our workforce across areas including but not limited to racial identity, gender identity, sexuality, disability and class (an area we regrettably have insufficient data for at this time). This is work we are doing now.

Further Breakdown

It may be the case that, as a mid-sized company, we are in a unique position of having worked with enough people to have statistically significant data, whilst also having the ability to recall (with recognised limitation) the individual identities that we have recorded here.

 

With this in mind, and as our data comes from such a significant range of areas of the workforce and the theatre ecology, we wanted to break this down further.

 

Of 133 Creatives:

Please note: 1 creative has also worked with us as a performer and so their data is included individually in both breakdowns, but just once in the overall figures

 

53.38% (71) were Male-Identifying, of which 2.82% (2) identified as a Trans-gender Male

46.62% (62) were Female-Identifying, of which 0% (0) identified as Trans-gender Female

 

86.47% (115) were White-European

9.02% (12) were of other White backgrounds (including Jewish)

1.50% (2) were Black

0% (0) were South Asian

2.26% (3) were East Asian

0.75% (1) was Mixed Race

 

0.75% (1) identified as having a physical disability

 

18.80% (25) identified as a Gay Man

1.50% (2) identified as a Lesbian/Gay Woman

2.26% (3) identified as Bisexual

0.75% (1) identified elsewhere on the LGBTQIA+ spectrum

 

 

Of 160 Performers:

 

51.88% (83) were Male-Identifying, of which 1.2% (1) identified as a Trans-gender Male

47.50% (76) were Female-Identifying, of which 0% (0) identified as Trans-gender Female

0.63% (1) identified as Non-Binary/Gender Fluid

 

65.00% (104) were White-European

8.13% (13) were of other White backgrounds (including Jewish)

13.13% (21) were Black

5.00% (8) were South Asian

4.38% (7) were East Asian

4.38% (7) were Mixed Race

 

1.25% (2) identified as having a physical disability

 

6.88% (11) identified as a Gay Man

1.88% (3) identified as a Lesbian/Gay Woman

0.63% (1) identified as Bisexual

1.25% (2) identified elsewhere on the LGBTQIA+ spectrum

 

 

Of 35 Musicians

 

77.14% (27) were Male-Identifying

22.86% (8) were Female-Identifying

 

97.14% (34) were White-European

2.86% (1) was Mixed Race

 

0% disclosed their sexuality

 

 

Of 60 Crew/Production Team Members

 

43.33% (26) were Male-Identifying

55.00% (32) were Female-Identifying

1.67% (1) identified as Non-Binary/Gender Fluid

 

85.00% (50) were White-European

11.67% (7) were of other White backgrounds (including Jewish)

0% (0) were Black

0% (0) were South Asian

1.67% (1) was East Asian

1.67% (1) was Mixed Race

 

6.67% (4) identified as a Gay Man

1.67% (1) identified as a Lesbian/Gay Woman

1.67% (1) identified elsewhere on the LGBTQIA+ spectrum


 

Of 20 Marketing/PR Personnel

 

35% (7) were Male-Identifying

65% (13) were Female-Identifying

 

100% (20) were White-European

0% were of other racial backgrounds

 

20% (4) identified as a Gay Man

5% (1) identified as a Lesbian/Gay Woman

 

 

Of 17 Producers

 

64.71% (11) were Male-Identifying

35.29% (6) were Female-Identifying

 

88.24% (15) were White-European

11.76% (2) were of other White backgrounds (including Jewish)

0% were of other racial backgrounds

 

35.29% (6) identified as a Gay Man

5.88% (1) identified as a Lesbian/Gay Woman

5.88% (1) identified as Bisexual

From this breakdown, we can see that the vast majority of Black, South Asian, East Asian, and Mixed Race individuals that are recorded in our total data are performers (160 individuals - 65% White-European, 8.1% Other White Background, 13.1% Black, 5.0% South Asian, 4.4% East Asian, 4.4% Mixed Race).

 

These more representative figures (though still not fully representative of London’s ethnic make-up) exist because of concerted efforts in the casting process of a number of productions to ensure representation on stage. There were no quotas for any production. We took the time and effort to ensure that we had seen enough people that we could knowingly cast the best performers for the roles, regardless of their background and identity. While there is still much room for us to do better, this is something we can be proud of and shows that hard work on the part of producers, directors, and casting directors can lead to better and fairer representation.
 

However, of the 130 creatives we’ve worked with, only 6 (4.5%) did not identify as being of a white background. This process has highlighted how we had only actively paid attention to visible diversity on stage and neglected to focus on the creators backstage. We must do better.

Ramin Sabi, Ceri Lothian & Abbii Clark, 16th June 2020

UPDATE: Further Intersectional Data Breakdown

Thank you to those who have called for a further intersectional breakdown of our data on Black artists, particularly relatig to those who identify as LGBTQIA+. Please find our data below.

Of 23 Black identifying individuals

4.4% (1) identified as Non-binary/Gender-fluid (this person worked in the capacity of Performer)

8.7% (2) identified as Bisexual (1 Performer, 1 Creative)

8.7% (2) identified as a Lesbian/Gay Woman (1 Performer, 1 Crew/Production Team Member)

bottom of page